Skip to content
A — documented

Churel

India
North-Western Provinces of British India, today Uttar Pradesh; Crooke's survey in the Etah area

Churel — the ghost of a woman who died in pregnancy, on the day of childbirth, or within the prescribed period of ritual impurity.

On an Indian village path by moonlight a young woman in a light sari turns towards a man with a turban and a lantern: her feet are turned round, the heels in front and the toes behind. A little further on, a grave with the earth disturbed.
Variants and names
Hindi चुड़ैल chuṛail, today commonly chudail; Urdu and Punjabi with their respective scripts; in the colonial spelling churel. Equivalents from western India recorded by Crooke: Jakhai, Jokhai, Mukai, Navalai; in Bengal petni and shakchunni; among the Indo-Guyanese of the Caribbean churile. To be kept distinct from the dayan (डायन), who is not a ghost but a living woman accused of witchcraft
What is told
The ghost of a woman who died in pregnancy, on the day of childbirth, or within the prescribed period of ritual impurity. In the description collected in the field she sometimes appears light in front and black behind, and she invariably has her feet turned round: the heels in front and the toes behind; she may present herself as a very beautiful young woman or as a little girl dressed in white. She targets the males of her own family — she is «particularly malignant towards her own» — and young men travelling alone at night.
What it was forthe author’s reading
In the current reading it is a device for managing grief and obstetric risk: it gives ritual form to a frequent death for which there was no remedy, and at the same time sanctions the threshold of puerperal impurity, which in the domestic system was a real and policed boundary. It is a functionalist interpretation, and should be taken as such.
Where it is attested
The standard source is William Crooke, The Popular Religion and Folk-Lore of Northern India, second enlarged edition, Constable, London 1896, volume I, pages 309-314, with a subsection devoted to the ways of repelling the churel at page 312; the first edition, An Introduction to the Popular Religion and Folklore of Northern India, is Allahabad, 1894. Parallel material in North Indian Notes and Queries, from 1891, and in Crooke in Anthropos, 1909, for the funeral rites. An earlier but literary attestation is Kipling's gloss in My Own True Ghost Story, 1888. Modern studies: Janet Chawla, Child-bearing and Culture, 1994; Sarah Pinto, Where There Is No Midwife, 2008, an ethnography of birth in Uttar Pradesh.
Caution
The defences described by Crooke are not literary folklore: they are practices observed and noted down on the spot, and they are worth listing because they show how concrete the fear was. Cremation, or else burial face down; the child removed before burial; the grave filled with thorns and covered with heavy stones; iron points driven in under the nails; and the ground scraped where the woman had died, with mustard seed scattered on the spot and all along the road taken by the bier — because the churel «sees the tiny grains scattered and stoops to pick them up», and the count never ends. Some things in circulation need correcting: the churel is not the dayan, who is a living person and can be accused; she is not «the Indian vampire», a category that comes from the English-language vampire encyclopaedias; the Persian origin one reads on Wikipedia is not documented; and the backward-turned feet are not exclusive to her, because Crooke attributes them also to the fairy companions of Airi in Kumaon. Finally, the attested definition does not concern only death in childbirth: it includes pregnancy and the period of impurity.

The grade says how well the entry is documented, not how interesting it is. How the grades are assigned.

Related by theme

Entries that share the motif, the phenomenon behind it or the history of their collection — not the geography.

BKuntilanakIndonesia — The Malay-Indonesian world; toponymic anchoring at the confluence of the Kapuas and the Landak, at Pontianak in West KalimantanAAlkarısıTürkiye — Anatolia; Yahnikapan, Eskişehir, where a healing «hearth» has been documented in the field up to 2022AÀbíkúNigeria — Yoruba area of south-western Nigeria; first documentation from the mission station at AbeokutaANahualMexico — Nahua and Maya Mesoamerica; documentary core at Atenango del Río, GuerreroBKrasueThailand — the central Chao Phraya plain (Ayutthaya, Lopburi, Suphan Buri), with modern spread into the Isan region and cognate figures in Khmer, Lao and Malay areasAManananggalthe Philippines — Tagalog-speaking areas of central and southern Luzon, which give the name; the western Visayas, on the island of Panay, with the province of Capiz as the epicentre of the reputationABoto cor-de-rosaBrazil — Middle and lower Amazon, ribeirinha communities; documentary core at Tefé and in the Mamirauá reserveCGranny womenthe United States — Southern and central Appalachia (northern Georgia, western Carolina, eastern Tennessee, eastern Kentucky, West Virginia, south-western Virginia)AKelpiethe United Kingdom — Scotland: Highlands and North-East (Aberdeenshire, Banffshire, Morayshire, Perthshire)BLa LloronaMexico — Mexico City and the central plateau, with diffusion throughout the Spanish-speaking worldAQarīnEgypt — Egypt, with the rural documentation collected in Upper Egypt and the urban documentation of the zār rite in CairoARusalkaRussia — Eastern Slavia, with a differentiated distribution: Polesia and Ukraine agrarian in character, the Russian North aquaticBWitte wieventhe Netherlands — Drenthe, Overijssel (Twente and Salland) and Gelderland (Achterhoek, Veluwe); parallels in northern GermanyAYūreiJapan — The whole of Japan; poles at Kyoto, Edo-Tokyo (Yotsuya) and Himeji

← Back to the atlas of the world