Manananggal
the Philippines
Tagalog-speaking areas of central and southern Luzon, which give the name; the western Visayas, on the island of Panay, with the province of Capiz as the epicentre of the reputation
Manananggal — the kind of aswang that detaches at the waist by night and flies off as a half torso, leaving its legs where it set them down
- Variants and names
- manananggal; in nineteenth-century sources also mananangal; the older Tagalog form magtatangal; in Bisayan tanggal. It is an agent noun built on the root tanggal: diksiyonaryo.ph analyses it as mang+ta+tanggal and glosses tanggál as 'pag-aalis o pagkaka-alis sa pagkakadikit o pagkakakabit', the detaching of what had been attached, marking the root as shared by Bikol, Hiligaynon, Kapampangan, Tagalog and Waray.
The etymology is already eighteenth-century. Domingo de los Santos's Vocabulario explains that the magtatangal is so called 'porque es metáf. de Tangal que es desencajar; y el tal desencaja la mitad del cuerpo': to unhinge, to put out of joint. Blumentritt in 1895 records Mananangal as 'sinónimo de Magtatangal', and under Tanggal gives the same name among the Bisayans, for 'hechiceros que vagaban por la noche, volando, sin la mitad del cuerpo ó, según otros, sin la cabeza'.
The Austronesian comparison is documented and dated, not mine: G. A. Wilken in 1884 sets tangal beside Malay tanggal, 'uittrekken, uithalen iets, dat in iets anders besloten is'; Blumentritt derives from the same root Malay penanggalan, Makassarese popokang mananggala and Minangkabau palasik panangga. Regional synonyms collected by Maximo Ramos: abat (Waray), boroka (Ilocano, from Spanish bruja), mangalok (Cuyonon), aswang na lupad (Bikol), naguneg (Ilocano), laman luob (Tagalog), kasudlan (West Visayan). - What is told
- It is not a species: it is a type within the aswang category, and that is how it is classed both by the online Filipino dictionary diksiyonaryo.ph — 'aswang na may kakayahang hatiin ang katawan', an aswang able to divide its body — and by twentieth-century folklore scholarship.
The fullest description I was able to read is Herminia Meñez's, quoted at length by Hope Sabanpan-Yu: by day she is a beautiful woman, long-haired and fair-skinned; by night she discards her lower torso, hiding it under the sheets, in a closet or among banana trees, anoints her armpits with an oil that turns her arms into wings, alights on a roof and thrusts a tubular tongue between the palm shingles to draw out the viscera of the sleeper through mouth, nostrils, ears, anus, navel or genitalia. She stalks tuberculars and pregnant women. Before daybreak she must rejoin the trunk.
That is where the counter-measure lies, and it inverts the European repertoire: you do not act on the body that flies, you act on the piece left on the ground. Ashes, salt, vinegar, lemon juice, garlic, ginger and pepper rubbed on the stump prevent the rejoining. - What it was forthe author’s reading
- The accusation has an address. Since the counter-measure is the abandoned lower half, the tale supplies a protocol that looks testable, and in the folklore collections the suspicion falls on a known person: in the legend 'The Witch of Tawas', published by Damiana Eugenio, it is an old grey-haired woman of about seventy whom nobody in the village knows, because she is never seen by day. This reading is interpretation, mine and that of the studies I cite, not a datum.
What is documented is the use of the name as a collective stigma: Glenn Baes's article on the Capiz 'aswang phenomenon' treats it as a pastoral problem that 'dehumanize[s] Capisnon undeservedly', and in Tondo in 1992 a political reading circulated among residents, by which 'manananggal' was a nickname for politicians out canvassing. - Where it is attested
- 1589. Juan de Plasencia, Customs of the Tagalogs, Manila, 21 October: in the list of magical practitioners the seventh is the magtatangal, whose 'purpose was to show himself at night to many persons, without his head or entrails', carrying it about and returning it to his body in the morning, 'in Catanduanes'; the eighth is the osuang, 'equivalent to sorcerer', who flew and ate human flesh, 'among the Visayas Islands; among the Tagalos these did not exist'. Read in Blair and Robertson's translation, The Philippine Islands, vol. 7, pp. 193-194.
1703. Domingo de los Santos, Vocabulario de la lengua Tagala, Tayabas: 'Magtatangal: they say it flies and eats human flesh, but when it takes flight it carries no more than half the body'. It is the oldest dated text in which the root and the half body stand together; I read it in the reprints of 1794, p. 226, and 1835.
1738. Juan Francisco de San Antonio, Chronicas, pp. 156-157, repeats Plasencia's list and returns to the head without entrails; in English in Blair and Robertson, vol. 40, pp. 344-346, where at p. 342 the bird tictic guides the osuang to the house where a birth is under way.
1860. Noceda and Sanlúcar, Vocabulario de la lengua tagala, Manila, p. 453: 'Brujo que vuela dexando medio cuerpo, magtatangal, manananggal'. It is the oldest dated attestation of the modern word I have found.
1895. Fernando Blumentritt, Diccionario mitológico de Filipinas, in W. E. Retana, Archivo del Bibliófilo Filipino, II, Madrid 1896, pp. 335-454: entries Asuang, Magtatangal, Mananangal, Osuang, Tanggal. Eleven years earlier G. A. Wilken had already set tangal beside Malay tanggal.
1933. Eulogio B. Rodriguez in The Historical Review 5/1, p. 15, reprinted in the Encyclopedia of the Philippines, 1936: the first dated description in English, already with the half body and the ashes.
Then Maximo D. Ramos, 1971; Herminia Meñez, Ateneo, 1996; and the open-access Philippine articles of Hope Sabanpan-Yu, Glenn Baes and Jay Jomar Quintos. - Caution
- Grade A, and I shall say what it rests on. I read in full text Plasencia in Blair and Robertson's version, the whole of Blumentritt's Diccionario of 1895, page 453 of the Noceda-Sanlúcar of 1860 in two independent digitisations, and three open-access Philippine articles. I searched for 'manananggal' in 53 of the 55 volumes of Blair and Robertson — 9 and 37 were unavailable to me — and it never appears: the modern word is not in the colonial relations, neither in Loarca 1582 nor in Chirino 1604, who on the relevant pages is dealing with the catalonas of Taytay and not with half bodies. Of Maximo Ramos I have seen extracts with page numbers, not the volumes; of Domingo de los Santos not the first edition of 1703 but the reprints; Meñez I cite through Yu.
The purely pre-colonial myth does not hold. The modern name appears in 1860; the figure, under the name magtatangal, in 1589, already inside a missionary apparatus that separated Tagalogs from Visayans and recorded the osuang as a Visayan thing.
Nor does the smooth identification of the colonial magtatangal with the modern manananggal. Plasencia in 1589 and San Antonio in 1738 describe a body left without head and entrails, that is, the shape of the Malay penanggalan; the half body appears in the vocabulary of 1703. The contradiction was noted at the time: Blumentritt in 1895 remarks that 'Bowring dice el contrario', and Zaide in 1939 still wrote 'head'.
Nor does the European vampire: a living person, not a revenant; no grave, no contagion; it is killed not with a stake but by salting the legs it left on the ground.
The point I most wanted remains undocumented: I found not one dated case of physical violence against an accused person.
The grade says how well the entry is documented, not how interesting it is. How the grades are assigned.